← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27141/2019bail granted

Sukhdev Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-25Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27141 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

SUKHDEV YADAV Son of Amrit Yadav, Resident of Village - Ashadhi, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada 2.

Pramila Devi Wife of Sukhdeo Yadav, Resident of Village - Ashadhi, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Manorama Devi Wife of Santosh Kumar, D/o- Saryug Yadav, Resident of Village - Abdalpur, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 228 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of Santosh Kumar, who is the husband of complainant. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27141 of 2019(2) dt.25-04-2019 2/2 weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Complaint Case No. 228 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) mkchy/- U T