Kiran Kumari v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16223 of 2017 =========================================================== Kiran Kumari w/o Sri Ram Kumar Srivastawa, resident of Village and P.O. Bhakurahar, Police Station- Bairagania, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India, through the D.G.-cum- Secretary, Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi.

2. The Chief Post Master General, Bihar Circle, Patna.

3. The Post Master General, Northern Region, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Sitamarhi Division, Sitamarhi. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D Sanjay, Addl.S.G. Ms. Kanak Verma, C.G.C.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 23-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India. The order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (hereinafter referred to as the "Tribunal") passed in O.A. No. 375/2015 dated 22.09.2016 does not require any interference.

The Tribunal has rightly held that the Limited Transfer Facility is not meant for transfer from one post to another in the same Branch Post Office. If the object of filing

Patna High Court CWJC No.16223 of 2017 dt.23-11-2017 such O.A. of the petitioner is to lighten the work load upon herself, she should look for alternative employment and not innovate.

The Writ Application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 24.11.2017 Transmission Date NA Rajeev/-