Babloo Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28435 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

BABLOO SAH S/o Bindeshwari Sah R/o village- Bagwara, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai 2.

Krishnandan Sah @ Krishnandeo Sah S/o Bindeshwari Sah R/o villageBagwara, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in Muffasil P. S. Case No. 111 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 414, 420, 467, 468, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act.

In the written report, it is alleged that police on confidential information that Bideshwari Sah and his sons as mentioned in the written report were indulged in business of storage of k. oil to make duplicate diesel raided the house of Bindeshwari Sah and recovered 13400 litres of k. oil and other articles as mentioned in the seizure list.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28435 of 2019(2) dt.30-04-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for petitioners has submitted that petitioners have been made accused because they are son of Bindeshwari Sah.

Petitioners are in custody since 3.3.2019.

Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SDJM Begusarai, in connection with Muffasil P. S. Case No. 111 of 2019 subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioners.

It is mentioned in para 3 of bail petition that petitioner no.1 is accused in another case under the Excise Act. The petitioner no.1 will file affidavit at the time of filing bail bond that he would not indulge himself in such type of activities in future. If he is found indulged in such type of activities, his bail bond in instant case will liable to be cancelled.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T