Patna High CourtMJC/2704/2015disposed

Babita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Amitabh Chaudhary, The Principal Secretary, Welfare Department, Govt

2017-07-07The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2704 of 2015 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 352 of 2010 ======================================================

1. Babita Kumari Wife of Randhir Kumar Singh, Resident of Village - Dhabauli, P.s. - Sour Bazar, District - Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Sri Amitabh Chaudhary, The Principal Secretary, Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner, Presently posted as the Director, Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Binod Kumar Gunjayar, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the District Magistrate, Saharsa.

4. Sri Munni Das, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the District Programme Officer, Saharsa.

5. Sri Karpuri Thakur, son of not known to the petitioner, Presently posted as the Child development Project Officer, Sour Bazar, District - Saharsa.

6. Sri Ram Shankar Singh, son of not knwon to the petitioner, presently Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj, Dhobolu West, Block- Sour Bazar, District - Saharsa.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 07-07-2017 In the show cause filed by the respondents, an averment is made in para 7 onwards that the Block Development Officer-cum- C.D.P.O., Patarghat has initiated the process for selection of the candidate and the same has been communicated and the orders passed, as is evident from Annexure-A to the show cause.

That being so, no further action is required to be

Patna High Court MJC No.2704 of 2015 (3) dt.07-07-2017 2/2 taken in the matter.

In case the petitioner is aggrieved with the manner in which the compliance has been done, she may challenge the same in accordance with law in an appropriate proceeding. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- U