Patna High CourtCR. REV./329/2023dismissed

Md. Saddam Hussain @ Saddam Hussain @ Saddam Miyan v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-22Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.329 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2012 Thana- IMADPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

MD. SADDAM HUSSAIN @ SADDAM HUSSAIN @ SADDAM MIYAN Son of Late Lallu Mian under the Guardian Ship of his mother Nazma Khatoon the Natural Guardian of Appellant No. 1. Resident of village-Moap Kalan, Moap Buzurg, P.S.-Imadpur, District-Bhojpur (Ara) 2.

NASIM MIYAN @ NASIM ALAM Son of Late Safi Miyan @ Safi Alam under the Guardian Ship of his mother (Rukhshana Khatoon) Natural Guardian of Appellan No. 2. Resident of village-Moap Kalan, Moap Buzurg, P.S.-Imadpur, District-Bhojpur (Ara) 3.

ALAMGIR Son of Md. Anwar Ali under the Guardian Ship of his father is the Natural Guardian namely Md. Anwar Ali. Appellants are with the Natural Guardian of village-Moap Kalan, Moap Buzurg, P.S.-Imadpur, District-Bhojpur (Ara) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shakil Ahmad Khan For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-08-2023

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.

2. The petitioners have filed the present revision application against the order, dated 20.02.2023, passed by the learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, at Ara, in Sessions Trial No. 145 of 2013, whereby the learned District Court has rejected the petition of the petitioners for holding them as juvenile.

3. It is an admitted position that the petitioners have not moved any application for determination of their age

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.329 of 2023(3) dt.22-08-2023 2/2 before the Juvenile Justice Board, Purnea, under Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

4. Accordingly, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application, with liberty to approach the Juvenile Justice Board, Purnea, for determination of their age.

5. Permission is granted.

6. This application is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √