Patna High CourtL.P.A/439/2015dismissed

Sangita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-11Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.439 of 2015 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7143 of 2014 =========================================================== Sangita Kumari wife of Sri Indradeo Sharma R/o Village Rampur Bakhtaur @ Godiha Bahadurpur, P.O. + P.S. Goraul, Dist. Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner / Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Secretary, Social Welfare, Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Director, Social Welfare, Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur Distt. Muzaffarpur.

5. Collector Vaishali.

6. Deputy Development Commissioner, Vaishali.

7. District Programme Officer, Vaishali.

8. Child Development Project Officer, Goraul, Vaishali.

9. Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Raj Katarmala, P.S. Goraul, Dist. Vaishali.

10. Mukhia, Gram Panchayat, Katarmala, P.S. Goraul, Dist. Vaishali.

11. Renu Sharma W/o Sri Braj Kishore Sharma @ Brijnandan Thakur R/o Village Godia, Bahadurpur, P.S. goraul, Dist- Vaishali. .... .... Respondents / Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Mahendra Prasad No. 2 and Mr. Rewti Kant Raman, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Uday Prasad, AC to GP 22. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 11-07-2017 Heard counsel for the appellant and counsel for the State. The appeal is dismissed. There is no infirmity with the order of the learned Single Judge because a decision for engagement on the post of Anganwadi Sevika taken more than seven years ago cannot be reopened and looked into at the convenience of the appellant on a spacious plea that he has been writing letters and

Patna High Court LPA No.439 of 2015 dt.11-07-2017 2/2 raising grievances before the diverse authorities without following the guidelines laid down against such grievances of selection or nonselection. Since the post in question is not a permanent post under the State but is a contractual engagement that is all the more reason why the learned Single Judge was correct in dismissing the Writ Application to which even we subscribe the view. The appeal is dismissed being devoid of merit. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 12.07.2017 Transmission Date N/A