Md. Rabban @ Gulam Rabbani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50951 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2014 Thana -BAUSI District- PURNIA ======================================================
1. MD. RABBAN @ GULAM RABBANI son of Late Jalil, resident of Village- Pahariya, Police Station- Balsi, District- Purnia. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikram Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 12 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 411, 414 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 Damage to Public Property Act.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement of the co-accused named in the F.I.R. and nothing has been recovered against the petitioner and having no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail application. Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am persuaded to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail. In the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50951 of 2016 (2) dt.14-12-2016 2/2 two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Purnia in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 12 of 2014, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with the further following conditions.
(i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(ii) (ii) In case of framing of charge, the petitioners shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the court below. In case of default in doing so on two consecutives occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the Trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners and secure his arrest in accordance with law.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) siddharth/- U T