Vijan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30499 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2022 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
VIJAN PASWAN Son of Pramod Paswan Resident of village-Bishanpur P.S.-Benipatti, District-Madhubani 2.
REKHA DEVI Wife of Vijan Paswan Resident of village-Bishanpur P.S.- Benipatti, District-Madhubani 3.
GURUDEV PASWAN Son of Vijan Paswan Resident of village-Bishanpur P.S.-Benipatti, District-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 25-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioners along with another is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant, when
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30499 of 2023(3) dt.25-07-2023 2/3 she went to attend call of nature.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They have committed no offence. The victim girl has recovered and she stated in her statement recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C., in which she specifically stated that the co-accused Bholu Kumar used to have a physical relationship with her, on the false pretext of marriage. The victim girl does not whispered about the complicity of these petitioners. He submitted that the petitioners are the family members of the main co-accused Bholu Kumar due to which, they have been implicated in the present case. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. They are languishing in judicial custody for more than ten months.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30499 of 2023(3) dt.25-07-2023 3/3 Court below in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 108 of 2022.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T