← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28503/2022bail granted

Santosh Mahto @ Santosh Kumar Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-02Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28503 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2022 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Santosh Mahto @ Santosh Kumar Mehta Son Of Ram Pravesh Mahto R/OVillage- Kathwar, Kathbar P.S. Madanpur District-Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 30(b), 30(c) and 33 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

It is a case of recovery of Mahua liquor from a bamboo bush.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that he has no concern with the seized liquor or bamboo bush and nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has not been apprehended at the spot and the name of the petitioner came into

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28503 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/2 light on the basis of local Chaukidar. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise Court-I, Aurangabad in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 129 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T