Kanchan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31382 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2024 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Kanchan Kumar Son of Suhag Ray @ Sohag Rai Resident of VillageLitiyahi, P.S- Raghopur (Rustampur O.P) ,Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Bela Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kanhiya Kishor, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 2160 liters of liquor from a tractor.
4. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized tractor and he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31382 of 2024(2) dt.30-04-2024 2/3 came to be implicated based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone. It is next submitted that it appears that the police in order to save the real culprits falsely implicated the petitioner taking advantage of his antecedent without disclosing the source.
5. The learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Gangabridge P.S. Case No.39 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31382 of 2024(2) dt.30-04-2024 3/3 effect.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T