Anil Sah @ Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30800 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2022 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.
ANIL SAH @ ANIL KUMAR SON OF LATE RAM CHARITRA SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAMPUR EKSHILA, WARD NO. 13, PSUJIARPUR, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR, BIHAR 2.
RAJA KUMAR SON OF LATE RAM SWARUP SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- RAMPUR EKSHILA, WARD NO. 13, PS- UJIARPUR, DISTT- SAMASTIPUR, BIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Madhav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 332, 333, 337, 338, 353, 427, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The informant alleges that, on account of death of a shopkeeper, thirteen named accused persons including the petitioners along with forty-fifty unknown persons had obstructed the road and raised slogan against the administration and when the informant tried to pacify the crowd, the accused persons pelted stone on the police force and also damaged the police vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No. 1 has antecedent of one case and petitioner No. 2 is a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30800 of 2023(2) dt.27-07-2023 2/2 person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from bare perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the allegation against the petitioners is general and omnibus in nature.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ujiarpur P.S. Case No. 150 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T