Patna High CourtCWJC/17133/2015withdrawn

Sunita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-14Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17133 of 2015 =========================================================== Sunita Kumari, W/o Satyendra Kumar Chaudhary, resident of Village- Athkoni, P.O.- Hiramma, P.S.- Tariyani, District- Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Sheohar.

5. The District Education Officer, Sheohar.

6. The Secretary, District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Sheohar.

7. The District Programme Officer, Sheohar.

8. The Block Development Officer-cum-Secretary, Block Appointment Committee, Dumari Katsari, Sheohar.

9. The Block Education Officer, Dumari Katsari, Sheohar.

10. Chanda Singh, W/o Jitendra Singh, resident of Village- Bisahi, P.S.- Sheohar, District- Sheohar.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Madhav Prasad Yadav, G.P. 23 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 18.06.2015 passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Sheohar (hereinafter referred to as the 'Authority') in Case No. 277 of 2011. Though, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the case was disposed off by order dated 20.02.2015, but by the subsequent order dated 29.07.2015, it was reviewed, which is beyond the jurisdiction of the Authority.

3. However, after some arguments, learned counsel

Patna High Court CWJC No.17133 of 2015 dt.14-07-2017 2/2 for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ application in order to enable him to move before the State Appellate Authority.

4. Learned counsel for the State does not object.

5. In view thereof, the writ application stands disposed off as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. If such appeal is filed before the State Appellate Authority within one week from today, along with a copy of this order, the same shall be heard on merits and disposed off expeditiously.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Anand Kr.

AFR/NAFR U