← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32310/2024bail granted

Shanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32310 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2023 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Shanti Devi WIFE OF Hira Sah VILLAGE- GHOBIYAHI, P.S.-HATHODI, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 2.

SIT SAH SON OF SHAMBHU SAH VILLAGE- GHOBIYAHI, P.S.- HATHODI, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 3.

PRIYANKA DEVI @ PRIYANKA KUMARI WIFE OF SIT SAH VILLAGE- GHOBIYAHI, P.S.-HATHODI, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 4.

FULIYA DEVI WIFE OF SHAMBHU SAH VILLAGE- GHOBIYAHI, P.S.-HATHODI, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 5.

KIRAN DEVI WIFE OF SHAMBHU SAH VILLAGE- GHOBIYAHI, P.S.- HATHODI, DIST- SAMASTIPUR 6.

RAHUL SAH SON OF RAM BAHADUR SAH VILLAGE- GHOBIYAHI, P.S.-HATHODI, DIST- SAMASTIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State .

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 363 ,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32310 of 2024(4) dt.09-09-2024 2/3 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3 . As per prosecution case , co-accused Basant Sah along with these petitioners kidnapped the daughter of informant.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that these petitioners are family members of co-accused Basant Sah and have falsely been implicated in this case . Specific accusation of kidnapping the victim is against co-accused Basant Sah , The victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P C has not named these petitioners except petitioner No. 1 . Petitioners are ladies and and claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition.

6 Considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr. P C , clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge - VI cum Special Judge POCSO Samastipur in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 182 of 2023 , subject

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32310 of 2024(4) dt.09-09-2024 3/3 to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U