Devendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.665 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 470 of 2015 =========================================================== Devendra Prasad son of Late Kashi Das resident of Village- Pakari Barama, P.S. - Pakari Barama, District- Nawada .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Secretary , Food , Supply and Commerce Department , Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

3. The Collector , Nawada

4. The SDO , Nawada.

5. The BSO, Pakari Barama, Nawada.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Vijay Anand For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rakesh Ambastha, AC to AAG-7 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 26-07-2017 The omission on the part of the appellant is evident from the narration of the facts taken note of by learned Single Judge. The appellant has chosen not to fight for his right for a cancelled licence for a long period. The revisional order was also passed against him in the year 2008, but he decides to prefer writ application in the year 2015.

Patna High Court LPA No.665 of 2015 dt.26-07-2017 These are good grounds for the Court to refuse exercise of discretion when there is obvious omission on the part of a litigant. There is no merit in the appeal. The same is dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 28.07.2017 Transmission Date