Md. Patlu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31810 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Md. Patlu (M), aged about 50 years, Son of Farjand Ali Resident of Falband, Ward no. 5, P.S.- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Md. Kasim (M), aged about 55 years, Son of Md. Jamhar Ali Resident of Village- Fulband, P.S.- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 14-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. C 92 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 323, 379, 406, 420, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation made in the First Information Report, the Complainant had given Rs. 25,000/- to the petitioner for purchase of land but, the petitioner sold the same land to another persons, namely, Md. Jahiruddin and Md. Tahir Hussain.

The dispute in the present case is basically a civil

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31810 of 2019(2) dt.14-05-2019 2/2 dispute.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Complaint Case No. C 92 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T