Chandeshwar Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38096 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2021 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== Chandeshwar Mukhiya S/o Shivpuzan Mukhiya R/o village- Amwa Majhar, P.S.- Bettiah Mufassil, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-09-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.
Heard both parties.
The petitioner seeks bail in Bettiah (M) P.S. Case No. 102 of 2021, registered for the offence punishable under Section 379, 411, 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, on the disclosure made by this petitioner, one pump set and one stolen motorcycle has been recovered from the house of co-accused Ramvinay Ram. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner. Recovery of stolen motorcycle and pump set has been made from the house of co-accused Ramvinay Ram. Petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2021. Investigation is complete.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38096 of 2021(2) dt.23-09-2021 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah West Champaran in connection with Bettiah (M) P.S. Case No. 102 of 2021, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below. (ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T