Gautam Prakash v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.749 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4206 of 2014 ====================================================== Gautam Prakash. S/o Shri Jai Prakash Rai. Resident of village - Badlachak (Rata Panchayat), P.O.- Dhankudia, P.S.- Balhar, District - Banka. .... .... Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar represented through the Collector-cum-District Election Officer (Panchayat), Banka, District - Banka.

2. The Returning Officer, Block Fullidumar, District - Banka.

3. The Assistant Returning Officer, Fulidumar, District - Banka.

4. The Secretary, Bihar State Election Commission, Bihar, Patna.

5. Kaili Devi. W/o Shri Ranjay Manjhi. Resident of Village - Ramchandra, P.O.+ P.S.- Fullidumar, District - Banka.

6. Dilip Kumar. S/o Parmanand Yadav. Resident of village - Kaitha, P.S.- Fullidumar, District - Banka.

7. Madharana Randhir Maharana. S/o Sri Rudreshwari Prasad Yadav. Resident of village - Takkipur, P.S.- Fullidumar, District - Banka.

8. Nistar Yadav. S/o Shri Maheshwari Prasad Yadav. Resident of village - Kaitha, P.S.- Fullidumar, District - Banka.

9. Rajesh Yadav. S/o Shri Devan Yadav. Resident of village - Kaitha, P.S.- Fullidumar, District - Banka.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

Mr. Kumar Kaushik, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, AC to GA-9 For the Respondent S.E.C. :

Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 27-07-2017 Appeal has become infructuous as is the stand of the counsel for the appellant.

Respondents have nothing to say in the said stand. Appeal is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Pawan/- U