Ravi Shankar Yadav @ Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29390 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-479 Year-2022 Thana- DUMRAO District- Buxar ====================================================== Ravi Shankar Yadav @ Aman Kumar Son Of Hare Ram Yadav Resident of Village-Keshopur, PS-Simri, Dist-Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aditya Nath Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Dumraon P.S. Case No. 479 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 472/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

3. As per FIR, the four named accused persons including the petitioner committed the breach of trust, cheating and fraud to grab the property of the informant on the basis of forged certificate, Adhar Card, Genealogy Certificate etc.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that daughter of the informant, namely,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29390 of 2023(3) dt.28-08-2023 2/2 Sunita Devi who is wife of elder brother of the petitioner has stated that all the documents were prepared by her father (informant) and the petitioner has nothing to do with it. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail petition and submitted that petitioner has committed fraud by using forged documents.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, if the petitioners surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) saurabhkrsinha/- U T