Satish Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50209 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -461 Year- 2017 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ====================================================== Satish Kumar Verma, Son of Birendra Prasad, R/o Village+ P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur at present Bangali Tola, Buxar, P.S.- Nagar, P.S.- Buxar, District- Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anita Kumari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Buxar Nagar P.S. Case No. 461 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 452 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that First Information Report is against unknown. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. His name has come in the confessional statement of co-accused Hesamuddin who has stated before the police that the ornaments which were stolen from the house of the informant were sold in the shop of this petitioner. The case diary has been received.

Learned A.P.P. has submitted that there is no mention that any stolen article or jewelery has been recovered from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50209 of 2017 (4) dt.01-12-2017 2/2 possession of this petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Buxar Nagar P.S. Case No. 461 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T