Jamila Bibi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50332 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Jamila Bibi, Wife of Kayum Ansari, Resident of Village Khanaw, P.S. Bhabua, District Kaimur at Bhabua.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chaubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Bhabua P.S. Case No. 346 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-302, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner is a lady. She has clean antecedent. In the written report, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. In the written report, it is alleged that Rustam Ansari and Muslim Ansari fired causing injury on the person as mentioned in the written report. There is no any specific allegation of overt act against the petitioner.

Counsel for the informant has appeared and opposed the prayer for bail.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50332 of 2017 (3) dt.10-11-2017 date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 346 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T