Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 31681 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2018 Thana- Arwal District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar, son of Naresh Yadav @ Ram Naresh Yadav, Resident of Village- Motha, Police Station+ District- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chakrapani Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastriji ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

12-06-2018 Heard Sri Chakrapani, learned counsel assisted by Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajendra Singh Shastriji, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The sole petitioner, apprehending his arrest in Arwal P.S. Case No. 101 of 2018 registered for offence under Section 30(A) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, has prayed for grant of bail in the event of his arrest or surrender. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that from premises of Chairman of PACS and from number of vehicles, huge quantity of Indian make foreign liquor was shown to be recovered and petitioner was made accused only on suspicion, as if, petitioner was involved in illegal trade of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that Chairman

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31681 of 2018(2) dt.12-06-2018 2/2 of PACS has already been granted anticipatory bail. Considering the fact that huge quantity of Indian make foreign liquor to the tune of about 396 liters was recovered and there is specific accusation against the petitioner, there is no reason to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U T