Sunil Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52085 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -83 Year- 2017 Thana -SONEPUR District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Sunil Rai S/o Bhikham Rai, R/o Village- Paheleja Jaitiya, P.S.- Sonepur in the District of Saran , Chapra.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sonepur P.S. Case No. 83/2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 325, 332, 333, 353, 307, 379, 504, 427 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner that he along with other co-accused attacked upon the informant and others with lathi, danda and rod causing injury to the informant. It is further submitted that other co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 03.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 31016/2017.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52085 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 83/2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Saran, Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T