Sumit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1235 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6980 of 2022 ====================================================== Sumit Kumar Resident of Village Milki Saidpur Purkhomitpur, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Mr. Brajesh Malhotra the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Bihar, Patna. 2.
Mr. Yogendra Singh The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 3.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary The Additional Collector, District- Samastipur. 4.
Mr. Jafar Alam The Sub-Divisional Officer, Patory, District- Samastipur. 5.
Md. Balbir Das The Deputy Collector, Land Reform, District- Samastipur. 6.
Mrs. Prity Lata The Circle Officer, Morwa, District- Samastipur. 7.
Arvind Rai Son of Late Ram Shankar Rai, Resident of Village Milki Saidpur Purkhotimpur, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur. 8.
Ram Balak Rai Son of Late Kuldeep Rai, Resident of Village Milki Saidpur Purkhotimpur, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur. 9.
Biro Rai @ Birchandra Rai Son of Late Kuldeep Rai, Resident of Village Milki Saidpur Purkhotimpur, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur. 10.
Dharmendra Rai Son of Biro Rai @ Birendra Rai, Resident of Village Milki Saidpur Purkhotimpur, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (SC25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 21-11-2025 At the outset, the learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the Circle Officer, Morwa, District-Samastipur has already passed the final order under Section 6(1) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 on 03.08.2023 in connection with Encroachment Case No. 29 of 2022-23,
Patna High Court MJC No.1235 of 2023(3) dt.21-11-2025 2/2 whereby and whereunder it has been found that the land in question is a raiyati land, hence encroachment proceedings have been dropped.
2.
At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order dated 03.08.2023, by taking recourse to the due process of law. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.
The petition stands disposed off.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U