Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28557/2020bail rejected

Subhash Thakur @ Munna Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2020-11-23Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28557 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2020 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== SUBHASH THAKUR @ MUNNA THAKUR S/o Hari Shankar Thakur Resident of Village- Patahi Roop, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar @ S.K.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2020 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State, through Video Conferencing.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sadar Police Station Case No. 219 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

The prosecution story, as per the First Information Report, is that the police, on the basis of the secret information that one accused of Sadar Police Station Case No. 218 of 2020, having beard as per video clipping, namely Subhash Thakur @ Munna Thakur (petitioner) is at his house and he has looted cash, motorcycle and arms used in a bank dacoity, proceeded

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28557 of 2020(2) dt.23-11-2020 2/2 towards the house of the petitioner and recovered one pistol along with four cartridges from his waist, looted cash and motorcycle in connection with Sadar Police Station Case No. 218 of 2020.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and on the basis of the present case, he has been remanded in Sadar Police Station Case No. 218 of 2020. He further submits that apart from these two cases, the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the materials on record, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months from today, if the trial does not show any progress.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √