← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37820/2016bail granted

Brijmohan Kumar @ Brijmohan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-22Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37820 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2016 Thana -GORAUL District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Brijmohan Kumar @ Brijmohan Rai, S/o late Bhulan Rai, Resident of Village- Dhanegoraul, P.S Goraul, District Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D. N. Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Ajeet Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 22-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. Allegedly, 500 liters of Kerosene Oil have been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

It is contended that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is not at all concerned with the alleged recovery of kerosene oil. It is claimed that antecedent of the petitioner is clean.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Brijmohan Kumar @ Brijmohan Rai be released on bail in the event of his arrest/surrender

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37820 of 2016 (2) dt.22-09-2016 2/2 before the court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No.123 of 2016, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand Rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

It is made clear that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T