← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38010/2021bail granted

Raj Kumar Sah @ Raj Kapoor Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-21Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38010 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2020 Thana- BAJPATTI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== RAJ KUMAR SAH @ RAJ KAPOOR SAH S/o Gaurishankar Sah Resident of Village- Madhurapur, P.S.- Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 2609.58 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38010 of 2021(2) dt.21-10-2021 2/2 suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 2609.58 liters wine is recovered from a truck, Sumo Car, Tempo, car and three motorcycles parked in the Middle school. None of the vehicles belongs to the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-II-cum- Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi in connection with Bajpatti P.S. Case No. 270/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T