Raja Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27881 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== Raja Kumar Son of Bindeshwar Sah @ Vindeshwar Sah Village- Gurmiya PS- kartahan District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 29-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 310 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The allegation in the first information report is that three persons are said to have entered into the house of the informant and looted away cash and ornaments. They assaulted the informant and the compounder by the butt of the pistol.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the F.I.R. has been lodged against the unknown miscreants and the name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the confessional statement of Baidyanath Sahani, who is said to be the master mind of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27881 of 2025(3) dt.29-05-2025 2/2 entire occurrence. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a goldsmith and runs his shop in the name and style of Raja Abhushnalaya. The said Baidyanath Sahani and his wife had come to his shop to exchange of ornaments in place of cash and other ornaments. The bona fide of the petitioner is evident from the fact that he had issued a receipt to the said Baidyanath Sahani in lieu of the purchasing/ exchange. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no role to play in the theft committed in the house of the informant and even he had no knowledge that the gold purchased by him was stolen one. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 12.03.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No.102 of 2025. (Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T