← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31700/2018bail granted

Shanti Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-24Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31700 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2018 Thana -SHEOHAR District- SHEOHAR ======================================================

1. Shanti Devi, wife of Sogarath Paswan @ Ramswarth Paswan,

2. Shivu Paswan, son of Sogarath Paswan @ Ram Swarth Paswan, both residents of village- Bisahin, P.S.- Sheohar, District- Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 4/ 24-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sheohar P.S. Case No.28 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304(B) and 120(B) Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are mother-in-law and brother-in-law (Bhaisur) of the deceased. The husband and father-in-law of the deceased are already in custody.

There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31700 of 2018 (4) dt.24-07-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No.28 of 2018, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bonds and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- Rohit Kr.

U T