← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30087/2022bail granted

Lalbabu Sah @ Lalbabu v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-09Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30087 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Lalbabu Sah @ Lalbabu Son Of Late Jagdhari Sah R/O- Vill- Kalyanpur, P.S.- Madhopur Op, Dist.- Gopalganj 2.

Madhu Devi Wife Of Lalbabu Sah R/O- Vill- Kalyanpur, P.S.- Madhopur Op, Dist.- Gopalganj 3.

Manorama Devi Wife Of Santosh Kumar Gupta R/O- Vill- Flat No. C59 Hindalco Riveride Colony, Hirakund, Sambalpur (Orissa) 4.

Santosh Kumar Gupta @ Santosh Sah Son Of Chandreshwar Gupta R/OVill- Flat No. C59 Hindalco Riveride Colony, Hirakund, Sambalpur (Orissa) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kumari Alka Wife Of Dhiraj Kumar R/O- Mohalla- Aadarsh Nagar, P.S.- Siwan, Dist.- Siwan ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjay Kumar Patel, Advocate :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 09-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 307 and 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Act.

Allegedly, it is a case of cruelty to the informant due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30087 of 2022(2) dt.09-11-2022 2/2 that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioners are in-laws of the informant and they have no concern with the mess and business of the informant and her husband. Petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Siwan in connection with Siwan Mahila P.S. Case No. 51 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T