← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38009/2021bail granted

Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-21Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38009 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2021 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== GUDDU KUMAR S/o Jogi Tamoli Resident of Village- Naya Bazar, Kabaiya Road, Byayamshala Gali, near Shivam Cinema Hall, P.S.- Kabaiya, DistrictLakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 30(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 28 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the recovery is made from the betel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38009 of 2021(2) dt.21-10-2021 2/2 shop belonging to joint family of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 28 liters wine is recovered from the betel shop in question. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-2nd -cum- Special Judge, Excise, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) P.S. Case No. 175/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T