← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28534/2025bail granted

Bali Ram Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-07Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28534 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2022 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Bali Ram Prasad S/o Late Ramprit Sah R/o village - Chainpura, P.S. - Pupri, Dist. - Sitamarhi 2.

Mukesh Prasad S/o Late Ramprit Sah R/o village - Chainpura, P.S. - Pupri, Dist. - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case, it is next submitted that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place and the petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the informant by axe causing injury on head but then it is submitted that the allegation of assault is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28534 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/2 specific rather is general and omnibus in nature, further one injury was found on the head of the informant and the same was opined by the doctors to be simple which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence. It is also submitted that allegation of assault is not specific.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 116 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Saurav/- U T