Madan Poddar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4403 of 2012 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16117 of 2011 =========================================================== Madan Poddar, retired Principal, S/O Late Bachecha Lal Poddar, Resident of Mohalla Kotwali Chowk, Naka No. 6, Post Lalbagh, P.S. Town Darbhanga, District Darbhanga.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Sri A. Sinha, Principal Secretary.
2. The Director, Sri Kamal Kumar Sinha, Secondary Education, Human Resources Development, Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. Sri Chandra Shekhar Kumar, the District Education Officer, (D.E.O.), Darbhanga .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar, Advocate.
For the Opp.Party/s :
Mr. Ajay Bihari Sinha, GA-8 Mr. Surya Kant Kumar, AC to GA-8 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The present application was filed alleging violation of the order of the Court dated 10.02.2012 passed in CWJC No. 16117 of 2011, by which the District Education Officer, Darbhanga was directed to pass speaking order on the application of the petitioner within two months and if any amount or interest is found to be admitted and payable, it was be paid immediately thereafter. From the pleadings, it appears that though the order was not complied with within time, but ultimately the same has been done
Patna High Court MJC No.4403 of 2012 dt.31-08-2016 2/2 by the District Education Officer, Darbhanga, who has passed a reasoned and speaking order on 06.12.2013 and has rejected the entire claim for any payment to the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid, the order having been complied with, the present application stands disposed off. It is needless to observe that the Court, in its order dated 10.02.2012, had itself indicated that if any amount or interest is not found to be admitted and payable, the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same before an appropriate forum. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Sujit/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 02.09.2016 Transmission Date