Veena Kumari Baranwal v. The Punjab National Bank And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.1353 of 2015 dt.23-08-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1353 of 2015 =========================================================== Veena Kumari Baranwal wife of Sri Kapil Dev Prasad Resident of Masjid Road, Gopal ganj, P.S.- Alamganj, District- Gopalganj(Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Punjab National Bank through its Chairman, 7 Bhikhaji Cama Place New Delhi, 110066.

2. The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Morcha Road, Patna City, Patna.

3. The Debts Recovert Tribunal , Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv Mr. Saket Tiwary,Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-08-2018 The present writ petition has been field for the following reliefs- (i) For a direction to the respondents not to sell the land allotted to the petitioner as a member of the Housing Society.

(ii) For quashing the order dated 15.04.2013 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna in recovery proceedings Case No. 168 of 2009 so far as it has refused to release the land of the petitioner by dismissing the objection filed by the petitioner.

2. Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner makes a statement at the Bar on instruction that in a subsequent development, during the pendency of the writ petition, the said land of the petitioner has been taken out from the fresh advertisement and

Patna High Court CWJC No.1353 of 2015 dt.23-08-2018 hence the writ petition need not be pressed having become infructuous.

3. Having regard to the statement made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 27.08.2018 Transmission Date NA