Anand Singh @ Anand Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35025 of 2018 (2) dt.06-07-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35025 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -47 Year- 2017 Thana -SURYAPURA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. ANAND SINGH @ ANAND KUMAR, S/o Kamdeo Singh,

2. Chhati Singh, S/o Late Sahut Singh,

3. Samrathi Singh @ Shamirathi Singh, S/o Shri Dhan Kumar Singh,

4. Kamendra Singh, S/o Shri Dhan Kumar Singh, null

5. Anil Kumar, S/o Vijay Singh,

6. Pintu Kumar, S/o Fagu Singh,

7. Arbind Kumar, S/o Late Sagar Singh, All resident of Village- Nonar, P.S.- Surajpura, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-07-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Surajpura P.S. Case No. 47 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 504, 379 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioners is that they have dragged the informant from the bus and taking village and assaulted him and when the villagers of the informant came to save, they were also assaulted.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have falsely been implicated in this case and there is case and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35025 of 2018 (2) dt.06-07-2018 counter case and the dispute with respect to the payment which has occurred in the harvest of wheat. Further submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that co-accused having similar allegation has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail vide order dated 14.06.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.32315 of 2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also. The learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas, in connection with Surajpura P.S. Case No. 47 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the condition that one of the bailer should be local bailer.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sanjeev/- U T