Chhatish Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32463 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2017 Thana -AMARPUR District- BANKA ======================================================
1. Chhatish Yadav son of Madhuti Yadav
2. Mantu Yadav
3. Pankaj Yadav Both Son of Late Ambika Yadav
4. Ritesh Yadav son of Mantu Yadav All resident of Village- Bidanchak, P.S. Amarpur, District Banka.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 195 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 337, 308, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the father of informant and his other family members. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been made accused in this case in the background of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties and although there is allegation of assault against the petitioner, however all the injuries caused to the injured were found tobe simple in nature.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32463 of 2018 (2) dt.28-06-2018 2/3 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 195 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32463 of 2018 (2) dt.28-06-2018 3/3 prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T