← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1359/2024withdrawn

Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-22Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1359 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12343 of 2023 ====================================================== Manish Kumar Son of Late Brahamdeo Prasad Resident of Village-Cherki dih, Police Station- sherghati in the district of Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. K.K. Pathak, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mr. K.K. Pathak, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mr. Kanhaiya Prasad Srivastava, Son of not known to the petitioner, the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Mrs. Punam Kumari wife of not known to the petitioner, the Regional Deputy Director of Education, Magadh Division, Gaya. 5.

Dr. Om Prakash, Son of not known to the petitioner, the District Education Officer, Gaya.

6.

Mr. Vidyanand Thakur, son of not known to the petitioner, the District Program Officer (Estb.), Gaya.

7.

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, wife of not known to the petitioner, the Block Education Officer, Dumaria in the district of Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Government Pleader 17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-08-2025

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.

2. Learned Counsel for the Opposite Parties submits that I. A. No. 01 of 2025 has been filed by Opposite Party Nos. 5 and 6, seeking extension of time for their personal appearance through virtual mode on the ground of their engagement due to the programme of Prime Minister, at

Patna High Court MJC No.1359 of 2024(5) dt.22-08-2025 2/2 Gaya. Accordingly, they have sought further date for their appearance before this Court through virtual mode.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed from his client to withdraw this contempt application.

4. Considering the prayer of the petitioner, this contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. The personal appearance of the Opposite Party Nos. 5 and 6 is dispensed with.

6. I. A. No. 01 of 2025 is also disposed accordingly. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √