Indreshwar Prasad Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1786 of 2016 =========================================================== Indreshwar Prasad Singh son of Late Kailash Prasad Singh, resident of villageLilhaul, P.s.- Singhia, District- Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Railways, Govt. of India, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi

2. The Railway Board, Ministry of Railways, Govt. of India, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi through D.I.G. Administration

3. The Director General, Railway Protection Force, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi

4. The General Manager, E.C. Railway, Hajipur

5. The Chief Security Commissioner/R.P.F., E.C. Railway, Hajipur

6. The Divisional Security Commissioner/R.P.F. Samastipur

7. The Senior Divisional Finance Manager, D.R.M. Office, Samastipur .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. D.K. Sr. Adv. Mr. Kumar Alok, Adv.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-10-2017 Heard Mr. D.K. Sinha Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the Railway. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier vide order dated 10.08.2017 two weeks time was granted to the petitioner to file substitution petition. The petitioner died during the pendency of the writ application. Neither the counsel for the petitioner is present nor any prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner.

Mr. Sinha informed the court that till date substitution petition has not been filed and he submits that for doing justice this

Patna High Court CWJC No.1786 of 2016 dt.04-10-2017 2/2 writ application may be disposed of with liberty to the legal heir of the petitioner to file representation to the pension authority for redressal of her grievance in view of the fact that the petitioner is no more. The legal heir may approach the concerned authority. With the aforesaid, the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the heirs of the petitioner to approach the respondent Director General R.P.F., Samastipur who shall look into the grievance of the heirs of the petitioner and dispose of the writ application by speaking order and will ensure that all admissible dues are paid to the heirs of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date filing of such representation.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Vinita/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 18/10/2017 Transmission Date NA