Dr. Syed Hasan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16819 of 2015 =========================================================== Dr. Syed Hasan Son of Late Maulana Amir Hasan Permanent resident of village - Chandanpatti, P.S. Pator, District - Darbhanga, at Present resident of Royal Hashmat Villa, Near Patna Nursery, Ashiana Road, P.O. B.V. College, P.S. L.B. Shastri Nagar, Patna 14 .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Higher Education, Department of Human Resource, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura through the Vice Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura, P.O. & P.S. Madhepura, District - Madhepura, Bihar

3. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura

4. The Financial Advisor, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura

5. The Finance officer, B.N. Mandal University, Madhepura .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemendra Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Adv.

For the State : Mr. Anant Prasad Singh, SC-15 For the University : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Verma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the University.

2.

The basic dispute in the matter is in respect of entitlement of an increment to the petitioner with effect from 01.02.1996. The claim of the petitioner is that though he was entitled for such an increment, the same was not granted to him.

3.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the University submitted that the entire calculation was brought to the notice of the petitioner and his comment in respect of anomalies in calculation was invited but at no point of time he could point out any anomaly in the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16819 of 2015 dt.10-10-2017 2/2 calculation or increment of pension pursuant to the letter issued by the Registrar of the University on 17.10.2014.

4.

As the matter relates to accounting, I deem it appropriate that the petitioner may file a detailed representation highlighting his claim before the Registrar of the University within four weeks from today. In case of filing of such a representation, the Registrar of the University shall be required to either personally examine the claim of the petitioner or to get it examined by the Finance Officer of the University/Auditor of the State Government and after getting the claim of the petitioner examined, a reasoned order should be passed meeting all the points raised by the petitioner within four weeks from the date of filing of the representation. In case any amount is found payable to the petitioner, the same should also be paid within four weeks thereafter. 5.

In case the claim of the petitioner is rejected, the reasoned order must be communicated to the petitioner on his postal address. 6.

With the aforesaid observations and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 11-10-2017 Transmission Date