Krishna Sahni @ Krishna Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35412 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-692 Year-2023 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Krishna Sahni @ Krishna Sahani son of Lakhan Sahni Resident of VillagePanapur Khalwa Tola, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Harsidhi, Dist.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rina Sinha, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 692 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. All the F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner, on non-fulfillment of demand of dowry, in furtherance of the common intention are said to have committed murder of the daughter of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35412 of 2024(4) dt.06-09-2024 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. The real fact is that the informant's daughter died due to illness regarding which the informant's side was informed. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. The husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has been languishing in custody since 03.03.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 692 of 2023.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T