Sunidhi Kaushik And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.594 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Sunidhi Kaushik, Daughter of Dayanand Singh, Resident of VillageBarhari, P.S.- Goradih, District- Bhagalpur
2. Krishnadeo Chaudhary, Son of Shyam Chaudhary, Resident of VillageGoradih, P.S.- Goradih, District- Bhagalpur
3. Kamini Kumari, Daughter of Satyendra Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village- Kalyanpur, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Munger
4. Pooja Kumari, Daughter of Om Prakash Bhagat, Resident of VillageGoradih, P.S.- Goradih, District- Bhagalpur
5. Gopal Pandit, Son of Damodar Pandit, Resident of Village- Goradih, P.S.- Goradih, District- Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar
2. The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Department Of Education
3. The Chief Officiating Officer, Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination, Patna
4. The Deputy Director, Student Service, Bihar Board of Open Schooling And Examination, Patna
5. The Deputy Director, Examination and Evaluation, Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination, Patna
6. The Deputy Director, Accounts and Administration, Bihar Board of Open Schooling And Examination, Patna
7. The Coordinator, Education Centre, Amhara Kotwali Rajaun, Banka
8. The Deputy Coordinator, Education Centre, Amhara Kotwali Rajaun, Banka .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Shri Gopal Prasad Roy, Adv. For the Respondents : Smt. Nivedita Nirvikar, G.A. 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-01-2015 Shri Gopal Prasad Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that on account of certain developments that have taken place during the pendency
Patna High Court CWJC No.594 of 2013 (5) dt.19-01-2015 2/2 of this writ petition, it has become infructuous. It is, accordingly, dismissed.
(L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) (Gopal Prasad, J) K.C.jha/- U