Binod Kumar @ Binod Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28683 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-774 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE District- Saharsa ====================================================== Binod Kumar @ Binod Kumar Yadav Son of Suren Yadav Village- Rahua, Ward no. 5, Ps- Patarghat (Op Pastpar), Dist- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Nitu Kumari Wife of Binod Kumar Yadav @ Binod Kumar Village- Rahua, Ward no. 5, Ps- Patarghat (Op Pastpar), Dist- Saharsa ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State duly assisted by learned counsel for the complainant.

2. The accused-petitioner, named in the complaint, is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 774(C) of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 498A, 494 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is to commit cruelty upon the daughter of complainant alongwith other coaccused/family members due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry as raised for a cash of Rs. One Lakh.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28683 of 2025(5) dt.12-01-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that allegation leveled against the petitioner is general and omnibus qua alleged cruelty. It is pointed out that the matter was referred to Mediation Centre of this Hon'ble Court, where dispute and differences between the parties has already settled in terms of the report of mediation proceeding No. 1361 of 2025 dated 28.11.2025. It is submitted that terms and agreement between the parties duly signed by them.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State duly assisted by learned counsel appearing for the complainant, affirmed the aforesaid submission that now the dispute and differences between the parties appears settled.

6. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of the fact as the dispute and differences between the parties appears settled in terms of aforesaid mediator's report dated 28.11.2025, accordingly, above-named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from this order, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28683 of 2025(5) dt.12-01-2026 3/3 only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate - 1st Class, Saharsa/concerned court in connection with Complaint Case No. 774(C) of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short "B.N.S.S."). (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Rajeev/- U T