Shashi Bhushan Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33154 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -107 Year- 2017 Thana -BITHAN BAZAR District- SAMASTIPUR =====================================

1. Shashi Bhushan Yadav,

2. Ankit Kumar, Both sons of Umesh Yadav, Both are resident of VillageBelsandi, P.S.- Bithan, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ===================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s :Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ===================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-07-2018 The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Bithan P.S. Case No. 107 of 2017, dated 25.06.2017, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The petitioners are the sons of the deceased and the case has been lodged by their mother. They are alleged to have killed their father because of the father not obliging them in transferring the ancestral property.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33154 of 2018 (2) dt.02-07-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners, above named, is, hereby, rejected. (Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- U T