Nandeshwar Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48032 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2014 Thana -KADIRGANJ District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Nandeshwar Ravidas S/o Parmanand Ravidas, R/o Village- Pakaura Dih, P.S.- Kadirganj, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Braj Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 13-12-2016 Heard both sides.

The sole petitioner prays for anticipatory bail in connection with Kadirganj P.S. case no. 100 of 2014, registered under Sections 302/34 of the IPC.

It is stated referring to the FIR that the general and omnibus allegation is attributed to the petitioner and some other co-accuseds with regard to the assault and with regard to putting the victim in the well. Specific allegation of assault causing injury which allegedly proved to be fatal is attributed to Parsuram Ravidas. Referring to the Statement made in para 13, it is stated that co-accuseds, who are identical placed, namely, Birju Ravidas and Kalindra Ravidas @ Khalendra Ravidas have been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 45053 of 2015 and 52256 of 2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48032 of 2016 (2) dt.13-12-2016 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M, Masaurhi, Patna, in connection with Kadirganj P.S. case No. 100 of 2014, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. with the further following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.

(ii) As soon as the charges are framed the petitioner shall appear in person before the trial Court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U T