Smt. Sharda Devi v. Arvind Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.348 of 2026 ====================================================== Smt. Sharda Devi Wife of Late Nakhida Prasad Verma and Daughter of Sri Sital Singh, Resident of Village- Bhagwanpur, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Patna. ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
Arvind Singh Son of Late Ram Suresh Singh and Late Jeera Devi, Resident of Village and Post- Painal, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. 2.
Ratnesh Kumar, Son of Late Ram Suresh Singh and Late Jeera Devi, Resident of Village and Post- Painal, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. 3.
Ramakant Kumar, Son of Late Ram Suresh Singh and Late Jeera Devi, Resident of Village and Post- Painal, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. 4.
Sunita Devi, Daughter of Late Ram Suresh Singh and Late Jeera Devi, Wife of Kedar Singh, Resident of Village- Belaur, P.S.- Udwantnagar, DistrictBhojpur. 5.
Sri Anant Kumar Singh, Son of Late Devi Singh, Resident of Village- Parsa, Post- Parsa, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna. 6.
Sri Bhushan Kumar Singh, Son of Late Devi Singh Resident of VillageParsa, Post- Parsa, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna. 7.
Sri Prem Nath Singh, Son of Late Devi Singh Resident of Village- Parsa, Post- Parsa, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna. 8.
Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, Son of Late Devi Singh Resident of Village- Parsa, Post- Parsa, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Hansraj, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) against the judgment and order of remand dated 05.02.2026, passed by District JudgeVIIth, Danapur in T.A. No.08/2018 whereby
Patna High Court MA No.348 of 2026(3) dt.23-07-2026 2/2 the T.P. Suit No.105/1996 which was decreed vide judgment & decree dated 23.05.2012 and 06.06.2012, has been remanded to the Trial Court for retrial or to take additional evidence after framing the issue.
3. Mr. Hansraj, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the petition.
4. Accordingly, M.A. No. 348 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U