Rakesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 31619 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2023 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar SON OF RADHESHYAM PANDIT @ SOHAN PANDIT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - AJAYABGANJ KUMHRAR TOLI, P.S.- BHAGWAN BAZAR, DIST- SARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anjani Parashar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and allegation is of recovery of 50 liters of liquor from an open space situated near Durga temple.
4. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which is accessible to public at large and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of apprehended accused in police
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 31619 of 2024(2) dt.30-04-2024 2/2 custody, which does not have any evidentiary value.
5. The learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned First Exclusive Special Excise Court, Saran at Chapra in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No.414 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. It is further made clear that the learned trial court shall also verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than two case, then also the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T