← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28604/2019dismissed

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Chourasiya v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28604 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1278 Year-2018 Thana- SAHARSA District- Saharsa ====================================================== JITENDRA KUMAR @ JITENDRA KUMAR CHOURASIYA Son of Surendra Prasad Resident of Village - Danapur, P.S.- Danapur, Dist.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Saharsa P.S. Case No. 1278/18, disclosing offences under Sections 342, 323, 406, 420, 467, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case is that the petitioner pretending himself to be the Quality Manager in G.C. Corporation Development, Saharsa offered called the informant on his mobile phone and offered him to join on the post of quality engineer, on which, informant went there and thereafter, the petitioner and others took his signature on a letter pad, forms and blank sheet and also took Rs. 20,225/- and two mobiles and confined him. It is also alleged that other two persons were also confined there by the petitioner and others. Anyhow, the informant managed to call his friend about his confinement,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28604 of 2019(3) dt.16-07-2019 2/2 thereafter, he anyhow managed to escape from there. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and the money has already been returned to the informant.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances as well as the fact that petitioner is an accused in one more case of similar nature, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather petitioner should surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below will dispose of the same on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by this order.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T