← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31445/2024rejected

Amit Sharma @ Makurchand Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-05Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31445 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2022 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== Amit Sharma @ Makurchand Sharma Son Of Suresh Sharma Resident Of Village- Saraunia Kala, Ward No.- 11, P.S.- Bihariganj, Dist- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2024 Heard Mr. Pawan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 26.07.2022 in connection with S.T. No. 319 of 2022 arising out of Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 161 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 24.06.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 448, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 427, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 24.06.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10216 of 2023. Thereafter, the petitioner has again moved before this Court for grant of bail in Cr. Misc. No. 13236 of 2024 which was dismissed as withdrawn vide

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31445 of 2024(3) dt.05-07-2024 2/3 order dated 01.03.2024.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case due to admitted land dispute between the parties. He further submits that as per the allegation in the F.I.R the petitioner has assaulted the father of the informant by means of iron rod due to which he died. Apart from that the co-accused, namely, Suresh Sharma has also assaulted the father of the informant and he has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.11.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18658 of 2023.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the allegation against the co-accused, Suresh Sharma is that he assaulted the father of the informant by means of Dabia but no injury was found on the person of the deceased regarding the same therefore, he has been granted bail by Hon'ble Court and there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the father of the informant by means of iron rod and the postmortem report also support the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the cause of death is found to be head injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31445 of 2024(3) dt.05-07-2024 3/3

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with S.T. No. 319 of 2022 arising out of Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 161 of 2022 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge VIII, Madhepura.

7. Prayer is refused.

8. However, learned Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial at the earliest.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T