Dilip Kumar Paswan @ Dilip Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39816 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1371C Year-2022 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Dilip Kumar Paswan @ Dilip Paswan Son Of Vindeshwar Paswan @ Bindeshwari Paswan Village Najari, P.S.- Laxmipur, District Jamui 2.

Vindeshwar Paswan @ Bindeshwari Paswan Son Of Late Bhaso Paswan Village- Najari, P.S.- Laxmipur, Dist- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ajit Paswan S/o Late Rameshwar Paswan Resident of Village - Pratappur, P.O.- Dhandh, P.S and District - Jamui.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP Mr. Piyush Kumar Pandey, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1371-C of 2022 registered under Sections 323 and 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is alleged that on 20.05.2020, when complainant and his younger brother were engaged in construction of boundary wall of their land situated at Laxmipur. In the meantime, these petitioners came and put pistol on his temple and snatched Rs. 50,000/- which was meant for purchasing of bricks.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39816 of 2024(3) dt.22-08-2024 2/2 implicated in the present case due to land dispute. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Further submission is that the police after investigation has submitted final form finding the case false and hence petitioners have not been sent for trial. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Having considered the accusation, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate-I, Jamui in connection with Complaint Case No. 1371-C of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) utkarsh/- U T