Poonam Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28761 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-764 Year-2020 Thana- NATHNAGAR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Poonam Devi Wife Of Lalan Kumar Yadav Resident Of Village - Kishanpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District - Bhagalpur.

2.

Sulekha Devi Wife Of Santosh Yadav Resident Of Village - Kishanpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District - Bhagalpur.

3.

Manorma Devi Wife Of Bhola Yadav Resident Of Village - Kishanpur, P.S.- Madhusudanpur, District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Explosive Substance Act.

Petitioners are said to have thrown bomb on the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28761 of 2022(2) dt.07-09-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. Petitioners are lady. He submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.04.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37521 of 2021. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 764 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T