Ajitesh Prasar @ Vicky v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30625 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-373 Year-2019 Thana- RUPASPUR DistrictPatna ====================================================== Ajitesh Prasar @ Vicky Son of Abhay Pandey @ Abhay Prasar Resident of Sarswati Vihar Colony, Ambedkar Path, P.S.- Rupaspur, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. J.K. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 25-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner hereby undertakes to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 149 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 373 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the light of petty dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. It is submitted that in any event the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

5. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30625 of 2020(3) dt.25-01-2021 2/2 the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Danapur at Patna in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 373 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., if he is not otherwise required in any other case.

6. The provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed by the learned Court below within a further period of four weeks of furnishing bail bond upon verification that no grievous injury has been sustained on the informant's side; conversely his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled.

7. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T